Showing posts with label The Dark Knight. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Dark Knight. Show all posts

Monday, 2 February 2009

#13 Hollywood’s Answer To Creativity

First of all I would like to apologize for not posting a blog for a while but I have just been busy sorting out a little film project I have going at the moment but I will try keep up, just bare with me. I would also like to that the die hard people who keep reading my blog and would love some ideas from the readers about what to write about.

Where to start? Every year Hollywood keeps churning out terrible films that makes everyone wonder why it’s still the film capital of the world. A recent example is the awful looking (I say looking because there’s no way I would pay to see it) ‘Underworld: Rise Of The Lycans’. A prequel to the 2003 flop ‘Underworld’ and ‘Underworld: Evolution’ (2006). After two rubbish blockbusters you would have thought they would have got the message. However, apparently not because it doesn’t matter if the film is good or not, because if it has Will Smith in it, hundreds of sheep with flock in to the cinemas.

In fairness Hollywood does occasionally releases the odd good film, when there are in the mood. Films like Eastwood’s ‘Changling’ (2008) and Fincher’s ‘The Curious Case OF Benjamin Button’ (2009), which has hit the awards circuit, try to do something for modern cinema the just playing it safe with a sequel. Sequels on they other hand aren’t the worst thing. I’m not condemning them, after last years ‘Dark Knight’ it can only show a progression in great sequels (and the Harry Potter films I guess). What I am getting at is that Hollywood believes that it can stop thinking of new ideas and use ideas from a book or an action figure like ‘G.I.Joe’ (ok it looks) and it should come to a halt because with all there resources (or money) they should make new classics.

Hollywood’s plan is to just keep releasing sequels, adaptations and remakes with movie ‘stars’ (if you can call them that) year after year. What’s the point making new fresh films when the can just remake a popular 80’s television show? Why take a risk and try to push cinema like Gus Van Sant (Milk, Last Days, Elephant) does when they can make a great animation and build a franchise; mark my words there will be a ‘Wall-e 2’ or ‘Up 2’, ok maybe not the last one but 'Monsters Vs Aliens 2'. I would prefer to go see a documentary about a 1960’s journalist at my local Arthouse cinema then see the latest high concept movie.

Oliver Hunt

Wednesday, 7 January 2009

#4 Heath Ledger: Oscar Worthy?

The late Heath Ledger is properly most famous for being a gay cowboy, no the Joker, wait or was it Bob Dylan? Who knows, but word around the internet is that people want his performance in last years The Dark Knight to win him an Academy Award. However you must first consider that the Joker was not his greatest role. Much like how the Joker was not Jack Nicolson’s best performance either (it was One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest). What about some of Heath’s best films such as, Candy, I’m Not There and of course Brokeback Mountain.

Back in 06, Heath was up for ‘Best Performance From A Leading Role’ at the Academy Awards, for his fantastic performance in Ang Lee’s classic Brokeback Mountain (2005), but on the night it was taken by Philip Seymour Hoffman for Capote (2005). So if Heath can’t get an Oscar for properly (if not) the best roles of his career then should he win one for The Dark Knight? Is it sympathy vote? If he had not died last year would everyone still love him as much as they do know (I still would because I love the movie and character, but I don’t speak to every one)?

I personally think he should get an Oscar for all his late films that he did (mainly Candy) even though he has won numerous awards such as ‘Best Actor’ at the Austrian Film Institute. The nominations for 09’s Academy Awards have not been named as of yet, but when they are up I will do a blog of who I think should win. Until then I personally think you should watched some of Ledger great films (just not A Knights Tale).

Oliver Hunt

Tuesday, 30 December 2008

#1 Batman vs. The Dark Knight: Which Joker Is For Adults?

After the success of Christopher Nolan’s (Memento, Insomnia) The Dark Knight, the Joker’s character has been launched once again into character stardom. Now at about every themed birthday party, you can now expect to see at least one costumed psychopath in full make-up trying to pull of being the Joker. After watching the Dark Knight for about the fifth time, I started to compare Nicholson’s Joker to Ledger’s Joker in an attempt to figure out who portrayed Joker in the comic book sense for children and who portrayed Joker in an graphic novel way (e.g. Batman: The Killing Joke, Joker)?

Let’s face facts, not many people (people under the age of 19) remember or have seen the classic Tim Burton’s Batman (released 1989), where the brilliant Jack Nicholson played an excellent Joker. With Tim Burton’s Joker, he came across to be an over the top portrayal of the Joker, equipped with a long barred pistol for shooting down bat-planes and a hand buzzer for shocking co-workers. What also grabbed audiences the first time round was the Joker’s sick sense of humour which kids would not have found funny (then again the film was released as a certificate 15 over here in England). The Joker wasn’t just equipped with strange weapons but with ridiculous puns.

I believe that when Sam Hamm and Warren Skaaren wrote the screenplay they wanted the Joker’s character to resemble a funnier and less violent side of Joker because maybe cinema hadn’t been pushed to it’s limits, like it has been now. For example if they did the pencil magic trick back in the late eighties I might have had to been cut (having said that though the Joker was still a mad man in Batman). What Nolan did with Dark Knight was try to make it a realistic side of the Joker, cut out the cheesy tools of destruction and add believable weapons such as knifes and guns.

To be honest after Nolan’s first Batman outing with Batman Begins (released 2005) it didn’t seem to stand out from the rest of the superhero franchises out there but was still better then most. And after hearing that the caped crusader will be back I was some what sceptical and some what uninterested (who could blame me with films in the franchise like Batman and Robin). However over time the film started to catch my eye, and the final product ended up being my favourite super hero movie. I also feel that Ledger’s performance over shadowed other actors like Aaron Eckhart, who up until his partial of Two-Face wasn’t on my good side. Still Dark Knight has been hailed as Ledger’s swan song and it’s easy to see why. That film definitely has set a new bar for super hero and graphic novels movie alike.

To sum up I believe that Burton’s Joker portrayed a comic book side to the Joker, with silly gags and hilarious puns whilst Nolan’s Joker showed us the dark graphic novel side to what the Joker can become. Really even through the irony is that Batman was a certificate 15 and Dark Knight only a certificate 12; it seemed to me that the two should have been switched around.

And on a few last note I think Nolan should to a directors cut and add in more violence, not because I’m crazy but I think it’ll do him justice because Joker’s character is one that should be put in the mature film spectra instead of cutting little bits to get the child certificate. And lastly I didn’t talk about Cesar Romero because it would be like comparing Adam West to Christian Bale, I ain’t gunna do it.

Oliver Hunt
23rd Dec 08